ESPN and the NFL announced their huge partnership deal, where the league will own 10% of the network, but the jury is still out on whether this pact benefits fans.
The night before Disney‘s positive quarterly earnings report on Wednesday, ESPN announced its long-rumored, long-planned marriage with the NFL that will, for better or worse, change the way football and sports fans watch, read, stream, scroll, and consume content and programming for America’s dominant and most popular professional sport and television show.
The NFL will take a 10% stake in Disney-owned ESPN in exchange for the company taking control of the NFL Network, RedZone channel, and NFL fantasy properties. ESPN and NFLN will be two major attractions as part of Disney’s new ESPN direct-to-consumer offering launching on Aug. 21, whose all-inclusive package will cost $29.99 a month or $299.99 per year. While this major announcement was made in August 2025, a senior Disney executive said on Wednesday’s earnings call that the deal likely won’t close until the end of next calendar year, which could mean football fans wouldn’t fully feel the impact of this merger until the 2027 season.
“We believe this is going to be an unbelievable experience for our fans,” NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said on SportsCenter Wednesday afternoon, though he didn’t go into much tangible detail on why or how.
Subscribe for the biggest stories in the business of sports and entertainment, daily.
While shareholders will certainly benefit and the NFL gets to offload assets it didn’t necessarily want to oversee anymore for a sizable chunk of one of the most ubiquitous television networks on earth, will sports fans and the average consumer gain a net positive impact from this deal? The answer is very much unclear.
ESPN’s DTC product will be wide-ranging, providing the linear networks featuring Monday Night Football and daily football content on its existing shows, along with added NFL-centric content like Rich Eisen‘s daily radio show and additional MNF games from NFLN. Other smaller perks include highlights for the personalized AI SportsCenter, customized legalized sports betting information and tracking, multi-view options on the ESPN app for games and shows, select out-of-market preseason games, deeper fantasy and betting customization, and additional football content on Disney+.
But the new offering won’t include RedZone, which will come with an additional subscription fee bundled with NFL+, a product ESPN does not get in this pact, for the millions of football fans who can’t survive a fall Sunday without it. ESPN’s new rights to use the RedZone name to extend to other products like college football would be a major benefit for fans on Saturdays, and the NFL retaining Sunday RedZone production ensures we’ll continue to see people like Scott Hanson anchor coverage rather than someone like Stephen A. Smith or Kendrick Perkins.
In total, how much more content will football fans get by subscribing to ESPN’s $30 monthly DTC channel than the current ESPN+ product at $10.99 per month? For NFL fans, as of right now, the juice may not be worth the squeeze as they pay nearly triple the price for upgrades that seem relatively negligible.
Then there’s the matter of the gigantic conflict of interest ESPN will now have when covering the NFL, which will own 10% of the company. In calling this deal “a touchdown for fans,” the network’s statement boasts “ESPN’s commitment to NFL storytelling and its emphasis on news and information will continue as cornerstones to serve fans.” But can ESPN fully objectively cover the NFL now? Will the network even subconsciously pull punches when it comes to scandals or issues that portray the league in a negative light?
There have long been questions about this issue when it came to leagues and their rightsholders across sports, as they now pay billions per year for access to games, highlights, and related shoulder content, but at least still served as independent publications. Perhaps the top two sources for league news, analysis, and discussion, ESPN and NFL Network, are either owned by the NFL or owned by ESPN. It will make outlets like The Athletic and local and national newspapers even more important for conflict-free, objective reporting, even if ESPN continues its normal standards and practices.
While ESPN already owns a stake in the Premier Lacrosse League, this is the NFL we’re talking about. America’s most important sports news outlet and the country’s biggest sports league are now in a direct equity partnership with each other. Even if ESPN is perfectly transparent throughout the entire length of this partnership, the optics will continually raise questions.
The NFL will now be more indirectly involved in the sports betting business than it already is. While the league has direct partnerships with the major operators like FanDuel’s Flutter and DraftKings, it will now have an equity ownership stake in a company that has a deal with Penn Entertainment, which pays ESPN a ton of money to license the ESPN Bet name that you see many times every day on network shows and platforms. As sports betting integrity investigations become more frequent in the NBA and MLB, the NFL will soon profit off gambling more directly than ever before, adding more potential conflicts and optics issues as this area grows increasingly gray.
How will fans tangibly benefit from this aspect of the arrangement? Does ESPN becoming the NFL’s official fantasy product do anything for the fans?
The current regulatory environment may also cause some unintended consequences. You just saw Paramount and Skydance jump through some major hoops for the Trump administration to approve their deal valued at $8 billion. It’s officially just a coincidence that Stephen Colbert’s late-night show was canceled right before the merger was approved, and there’s the possibility that the administration comes up with a certain set of demands that alter or impact the current media landscape, which could be a net negative for media, news, and sports consumers.
A separate deal announced at the same time also extends ESPN’s NFL Draft rights deal through 2030, coincidentally around the time when the NFL can opt out of its current media rights contract. With tech giants like Apple, Google, and Netflix looming as competitors for NFL rights in the 2030s, Disney may have bought itself some preferential treatment when it comes to making sure it remains a valued partner that keeps a weekly game package and stays in the Super Bowl rotation.
Part of this deal also reportedly includes the NFL freeing four games a year from NFLN to put out as a new package to put out for bid in the open market, which is great for the league, but could potentially make watching your favorite team even more expensive for the average fan if those games go to a new rights holder.
By the time the NFL-ESPN deal is finalized toward the end of 2026, we’ll be months away from Feb. 14, 2027, when ABC broadcasts its first Super Bowl since 2006 and Disney simulcasts the big game for the very first time. This multibillion-dollar pact was announced this week to coincide with the upcoming DTC launch, but also with Super Bowl LXI in mind.
It’s unquestionably a great business arrangement for both companies, but that doesn’t mean sports fans are joining the NFL and ESPN in coming out on top here.
Read More:
How BigXThaPlug Became Country Music’s Favorite Rapper
Coco Gauff Is Making Greatness Relatable
Aryna Sabalenka: The World Now Knows
Why Christian McCaffrey Left Nike for an Upstart Performance Wellness Brand
From Odd Future to Fatherhood: Earl Sweatshirt Finds Peace on ‘Live Laugh Love’
