About Boardroom

Boardroom is a media network that covers the business of sports, entertainment. From the ways that athletes, executives, musicians and creators are moving the business world forward to new technologies, emerging leagues, and industry trends, Boardroom brings you all the news and insights you need to know...

At the forefront of industry change, Boardroom is committed to unique perspectives on and access to the news, trending topics and key players you need to know.

All Rights Reserved. 2022.

Adidas, Thom Browne Go To Court Over Trademark Stripes Feud

Adidas didn’t invent stripes, but they want to prevent other brands from using it for commercial gain.

When it comes to stripes, does Adidas immediately come to mind? Well, that’s what the beloved sportswear brand wants to prove in a contentious legal battle with luxury fashion designer Thom Browne.

On Tuesday, attorneys for the German company and Browne appeared in Manhattan’s Southern District Court to, hopefully, answer the longstanding question: Is Browne’s namesake label infringing on Three Stripes’ using the classic parallel stripes on apparel, footwear, and other merchandise?

To Adidas’ credit, they’ve been using the triple stripe emblem since the 1940s, and Browne didn’t debut his own line until 2003. Known for sporty but meticulously tailored suits, Browne adds four stripes to its various pieces. The 57-year-old businessman doubled down on that aesthetic by wearing a black and grey shorts suit paired with black high socks, one of which striped. A number of Thom Browne’s famous clients include LeBron James and Lionel Messi, the latter of which has also had a relationship with Adidas.

Sign up for our newsletter

Get on our list for weekly sports business, industry trends, interviews, and more.

According to WWD, Adidas wants $867,225 in damages that will go toward would-be licensing fees. Additionally, the brand is seeking $7 million USD for profits that it believes Browne made from pieces bearing stripes, according to Adidas lawyer R. Charles Henn Jr. of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP. Adidas, however, did admit they operate in a different retail market than their opponent. However, they still allege Browne’s use of four stripes still causes a mix up with buyers.

Browne’s attorney, Robert T. Maldonado of Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks P.C. argued customers aren’t actually misled by the two brands, and Adidas weren’t particularly affected with Browne’s inclusion of the stripes because the target audience is different.

“Thom Browne does not compete with Adidas,” Maldonado said. “Thom Browne is a luxury designer and adidas is a sports brand. Three stripes are not the same as four horizontal bars. [Adidas] fell asleep at the wheel and woke up too late.”

The trial itself is scheduled to last two weeks, but this spat has gone on for more than a year. Adidas first took legal action against Thom Browne in 2021, as reported by Hypebeast, claiming he is “selling athletic-style apparel and footwear featuring two, three or four parallel stripes in a manner that is confusingly similar to Adidas’ three-stripe mark.” In the original suit, they also stated Browne “imitates [its] three-stripe mark in a manner that is likely to cause consumer confusion and deceive the public regarding its source, sponsorship, association, or affiliation,” consequently “harming Adidas’ brand and its extremely valuable [mark].”


About The Author
Vinciane Ngomsi
Vinciane Ngomsi
Vinciane Ngomsi is a Staff Writer at Boardroom. She began her career in sports journalism with bylines at SB Nation, USA Today and, most recently, Yahoo. She received a bachelor's degree in Political Science from Truman State University and when she's not watching old clips of Serena Williams' best matches, she is likely perfecting her signature chocolate chip cookie recipe or preparing a traditional Cameroonian meal.